Editorial
The relevance of observational studies in rheumatology and
clinical immunology
S Chandrashekara
Author Affiliation
Managing Director and Consultant
Rheumatologist, Chanre Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Basaweshwaranagar,
Bangalore, India
IJRCI. 2013;1(S1):SE1
Received: 21 October 2013, Published: 1 November 2013
© IJRCI
Most of the developments happened in the field of
science, especially in medicine, are based on meticulous observations and
interpretations. In the recent years, it is necessary to support such
observations or findings by evidence based on experiments done at controlled
conditions. However, experiments involving humans have many limitations and
drawbacks. In most cases, it is difficult to full imply the findings observed
in animal experiments in human trials. Even in the era ruled by evidence- based
medicine, especially with reference to treatment strategies, observational
studies are significant to circumvent such inadequacies. Realizing this fact,
FDA (USA) in 2007 launched a well-known sentinel program named Observational
Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) to create a nationwide data network.1
The program assisted in developing many useful methods
and designs to utilize the available large observation data. Such programs
highlight the relevance of having observational studies with significant
findings.
It is essential to revise epidemiological data of even
the diseases that are well-described, especially with reference to autoimmune
and rheumatological diseases. The newer and well-defined criteria for diagnosis
and improved understanding of these diseases substantiate the necessity to
revise the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of such diseases.
Additionally, further evaluation of the emerging disease patterns and
approaches to diagnosis and treatment is vital.
The data available from developing and underdeveloped countries on epidemiology of autoimmune diseases is inadequate. Further updation of the perceptions of policy makers as well as the primary care physicians about these diseases is also crucial, as they influence the efforts of various organization and funding agencies.2 The efforts of many participating groups including the Community Oriented Program for Control of Rheumatic Diseases (COPCORD) launched by WHO–ILAR (International League of Associations for Rheumatology) are commendable. In order to highlight the significance of observational studies, IJRCI has launched a supplementary issue focusing on observational studies in rheumatology and immunology. The issue will be open for submission throughout the year and will be updated regularly. This may help to fill in the gap of publishing papers that are valuable for clinical governance and improving patient care in the field of autoimmune diseases.
Competing interests
The
author declares that he has no competing interests.
References
1. Observational
Medical Outcomes Partnership | Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership
[Internet]. [cited 2013 Oct 26]. Available from:
http://omop.fnih.org/node/22
2. Chandrashekara
S. Rheumatology Knowledge at Primary Care – A Survey Report. JIRA 2000; 8 (3):
94-96.