Editorial
Pathogenesis
of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome needs further
exploration
R
Misra1, S Chandrashekara2
Author Affiliations
1Professor and Head of Clinical immunology,
Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow-226 014, India
2Managing Director and Consultant
Rheumatologist, Chanre Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Basaweswaranagar,
Bangalore, India
IJRCI. 2013;1(1):E2
Received: 20 September 2013, Published: 28 September 2013
© IJRCI
Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APLAS) is an autoimmune thrombophilic condition with or without connective tissue
diseases, most commonly systemic lupus erythematosus
(SLE) manifested by vascular thrombosis
or fetal wastage, associated with antiphospholipid
antibodies (APLA). Variety of clinical features has been associated with antiphospholipid (APL) antibodies. Hughes and his team from
Hammersmith Hospital, London, first described the syndrome in 1983 and they
noted that the increase in anticardiolipin antibodies
(aCL) in a cohort of SLE patients was associated with
vascular thrombosis, recurrent abortions, and thrombocytopenia.1
The clinical
manifestations have expanded to include thrombocytopenia, hemolytic anemia,
cardiac valve disease, pulmonary hypertension, nephropathy, skin ulcers, livedo reticularis, cognitive
dysfunction, and premature atherosclerosis.2 The prevalence of the
disease among the different patient
populations in India has been reported to be between 25.5% and 51.5%.3
Compilation of the Pubmed studies available from India (Table 1)
clearly shows that there are gaps in the evidence base for the prevalence
of APLAS and its association with other
diseases.
Table 1: Studies from India on the
prevalence of APLAS
Authors |
Clinical Manifestations |
Prevalence of APLAS |
Makhija et al. (2008)4 |
Young stroke |
APLAS in 25% of 36 pediatric subjects |
Chandrashekhara et al. (2003)3 |
All thrombotic conditions like deep vein thrombosis, ischemic heart disease, stroke, and other vascular episodes |
22.5% out of 302 patients (screened only for aCL IgG) |
Vora
et al. (2008)5 |
Recurrent pregnancy wastage |
44.9% out of 381 subjects |
Mishra et al. (2007)6 |
Young myocardial infarction (MI) |
35% out of 40 subjects |
Vora
et al. (2008)7 |
Recurrent pregnancy wastage |
42.6% in 431 patients |
Vora et
al. (2007)8 |
Thrombosis in postpartum period |
37.55% of 32 women |
Ghosh
et al. (2006)9 |
Recurrent pregnancy loss |
27.7% of 155 women |
Velayuthaprabhu et al. (2005)10 |
Recurrent pregnancy loss |
51.6% of 155 women |
Singh
et al. (2001)11 |
Young MI and stroke |
18.18% patients (4/22) in the stroke subgroup and, 4.16% (1/24) patients in MI subgroup had raised aCL titers |
Kaneria et al. (1999)12 |
Recurrent pregnancy wastage |
32% of 50 patients |
Chakrabarti et al. (1999)13 |
Recurrent pregnancy wastage |
42% of the patients |
The major clinical
manifestations of APLAS are vascular thrombosis and fetal wastage. The
pregnancy failure could be partially explained by the associated vascular
events.14 The antiphospholipids
are a heterogenous group of antibodies targeted
against a wide variety of phospholipids, namely cardiolipin,
phosphatidyl serine, annexin
VA (natural anticoagulant), prothrombin III, and complexed prothrombin. Many years
after the discovery of aCL antibodies, it was found
that these antibodies mainly target beta 2-glycoprotein 1 (β2GPI), which
acts as a cofactor in binding to phospholipids. Therefore, the pathogenic aCL antibodies are indeed antibodies to beta2-glycoprotein
1. In addition, studies based on animal models have revealed the role of
complement proteins in disease development, as the pathognomonic
manifestations were not observed in complement knockout mice. However, the
evidence is insufficient on how these antibodies lead to thrombosis. Antibodies reacting to clotting factors phospholipid explain the in vitro prolongation of phospholipid
dependant clotting process.
The vascular thrombosis
occurs only in episodes and not as a continuous ongoing process, even in the
presence of APL autoantibodies. In asymptomatic
patients, thrombosis may not always develop in the presence of APL. In a
follow-up study conducted for 5 years among asymptomatic, APLA-positive
patients, the development of clot reported only in 8.1% of the subjects.15
This is explained by two-hit theory as the precipitating mechanism for vascular
thrombosis.16 It has been demonstrated in experimental models as
well as in clinical observations that infections, surgical intervention or
other procoagulant factor may precipitate thrombosis.16,17,18
Studies have demonstrated that initiation of these triggering events may affect
endothelial cells, platelets, procoagulant factors,
or on inhibition of anticoagulant factors or complement activation.19
The platelets play a
crucial role in the development of thrombus both in natural circumstances and
during pathological conditions. The presence of excess of activated platelet in
circulation has been described in patients with APLA using different
representative markers. In the recently published article in the current issue
of this journal, the in vivo and in vitro studies carried out by Singh et al. demonstrated the presence
of activated platelets have several altered functions. The presence of
activated platelets was demonstrated in this study without any anti-platelet
drug. The study had compared APLAS patients with healthy controls with no APLA
antibody and have demonstrated the pivotal role played by the platelets in the
development of thrombosis.20 The present
study provides evidence to demonstrate the presence of circulating activated
platelets in APLAS patients.
However, it is crucial to
explore whether the activation of platelet is a primary or a secondary event.
In animal experiments using anti-beta-2- microglobulin
they have demonstrated the activation of platelet to occur in the presence of a
primary triggering event, independent of anti-beta-2-microglobulin.16
In another study conducted in animal models, Jankowski et al. demonstrated that the platelets should be activated prior to
the development of thrombi. They used a photochemically
induced model of arterial thrombosis in hamsters to evaluate the procoagulant effect of a murine
monoclonal IgG with lupus anticoagulant activity
reacting with hamster β2GPI.21 Irrespective of the first
triggering event, the platelets are essential to complete the thrombosis. The
studies comparing the presence of activation of platelet in quiescent stage and
active thrombotic stage should clarify the sequence of events. The additional
probability is that different varieties of APLA, depending on its epitope specificity, may trigger alternative mechanism.
Clinical experience and published data have suggested incomplete protection on
recurrent thrombosis or pregnancy loss only with anti-platelet strategy.22
Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or oral anticoagulants are required to
improve the outcome. Detailed study on pathogenic mechanism, if possible using
individualized anti-thrombotic strategies, is warranted.
Competing interests
The
author declares that he has no competing interests.
References
1.
Harris
EN, Gharavi AE, Boey ML,
Patel BM, Mackworth-Young CG, Loizou
S, et al. Anticardiolipin antibodies: detection by
radioimmunoassay and association with thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lancet. 1983 Nov 26;2(8361):1211–4.
2.
Oku
K, Amengual O, Atsumi T. Pathophysiology of thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity in
the antiphospholipid syndrome. European Journal of
Clinical Investigation. 2012;42(10):1126–35.
3.
Chandrashekhara S, Kirthi R, Varghese J. Prevalence of anticardiolipin
antibodies in various thrombotic conditions: a hospital-based study. J Assoc
Physicians India. 2003 Apr;51:359–62.
4.
Makhija S, Aneja S, Tripathi RP, Narayan S.
Etiological profile of stroke and its relation with prothrombotic
states. Indian J Pediatr. 2008 Jun;75(6):579–84.
5.
Vora S, Shetty S,
Salvi V, Satoskar P, Ghosh K. Thrombophilia and
unexplained pregnancy loss in Indian patients. Natl
Med J India. 2008 Jun;21(3):116–9.
6.
Mishra MN, Kalra R,
Gupta MK. Antiphospholipid antibodies in young
myocardial infarction patients. Indian J Biochem Biophys. 2007 Dec;44(6):481–4.
7.
Vora S, Shetty S,
Salvi V, Satoskar P, Ghosh K. A comprehensive screening analysis of antiphospholipid antibodies in Indian women with fetal
loss. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Apr;137(2):136–40.
8.
Vora S, Ghosh K, Shetty S, Salvi V, Satoskar P. Deep venous thrombosis in the antenatal period
in a large cohort of pregnancies from western India. Thrombosis Journal. 2007
Jul 4;5(1):9.
9.
Ghosh A, Ghosh M,
Bhattacharya SM. Anti-phospholipid antibodies as a
cause of recurrent pregnancy loss: a study in Calcutta, India. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Jul;26(5):407–10.
10.
Velayuthaprabhu S, Archunan G. Evaluation of anticardiolipin
antibodies and antiphosphatidylserine antibodies in
women with recurrent abortion. Indian J Med Sci. 2005 Aug;59(8):347–52.
11.
Singh
K, Gaiha M, Shome DK, Gupta
VK, Anuradha S. The association of antiphospholipid antibodies with ischaemic
stroke and myocardial infarction in young and their correlation: a preliminary
study. J Assoc Physicians India. 2001 May;49:527–9.
12.
Kaneria MV, Vishwanathan
C. A preliminary study of antiphospholipid antibodies
in 50 cases of bad obstetric history. J Assoc Physicians India. 1999 Jul;47(7):669–72.
13.
Chakrabarti S, Bhunia C, Bhattacharya DK. The prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies in cases of recurrent pregnancy
loss. J Assoc Physicians India. 1999 May;47(5):496–8.
14.
Meroni PL, Borghi
MO, Raschi E, Tedesco F.
Pathogenesis of antiphospholipid syndrome:
understanding the antibodies. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2011
Jun;7(6):330–9.
15.
Ruffatti A, Del Ross T, Ciprian
M, Nuzzo M, Rampudda M, Bertero MT, et al. Risk factors for a first thrombotic
event in antiphospholipid antibody carriers. A
multicentre, retrospective follow-up study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Mar;68(3):397–9.
16.
Fischetti F, Durigutto P, Pellis V, Debeus A, Macor P, Bulla R, et
al. Thrombus formation induced by antibodies to beta2-glycoprotein I is
complement dependent and requires a priming factor. Blood. 2005 Oct 1;106(7):2340–6.
17.
Asherson RA, Cervera
R. Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2003 Oct;5(5):395–400.
18.
Cervera R, Asherson
RA, Acevedo ML, Gómez-Puerta JA, Espinosa G, De La
Red G, et al. Antiphospholipid syndrome associated
with infections: clinical and microbiological characteristics of 100 patients.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Oct;63(10):1312–7.
19.
Harper
BE, Wills R, Pierangeli SS. Pathophysiological mechanisms in antiphospholipid
syndrome. Int J Clin Rheumtol. 2011 Apr 1;6(2):157–71.
20.
Singh
NK, Behera DR, Yadav DP,
Gupta A , Dash D, Bandyopadhyay D. Role of platelets
in the pathogenesis of antiphospholipid syndrome.IJRCI. 2013;1(1):OA2.
21.
Jankowski
M, Vreys I, Wittevrongel C,
Boon D, Vermylen J, Hoylaerts
MF, et al. Thrombogenicity of beta 2-glycoprotein
I-dependent antiphospholipid antibodies in a photochemically induced thrombosis model in the hamster.
Blood. 2003 Jan 1;101(1):157–62.
22.
Crowther MA, Wisloff
F. Evidence based treatment of the antiphospholipid
syndrome II. Optimal anticoagulant therapy for thrombosis. Thromb
Res. 2005;115(1-2):3–8.