Reviews

Neonatal molecular pathologies induced by maternal anti-Ro and anti-La antibodies

Rafael Herrera-Esparza1*, Esperanza Avalos-Díaz1

 

Author Affiliations

1Laboratorios de Inmunología y Biología Molecular, UA Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas.98040 Zacatecas, ZAC. México

 

*Correspondence: Rafael Herrera-Esparza

rafael.herreraesparza@gmail.com

 

IJRCI. 2015;3(1):R3

Received: 5 May 2015, Accepted: 7 July 2015, Published: 19 August 2015

 

© IJRCI

 

Abstract

Maternal antinuclear antibodies with anti-Ro or anti-La specificity might be pathogenic to the fetus and could induce molecular neonatal pathologies, such as neonatal lupus (NL) with or without congenital heart block (CHB). The cutaneous manifestations of neonatal lupus appear at birth or a few weeks later, and skin lesions may persist for weeks. While CHB is characterized by intrauterine bradycardia or low heart rates at birth and may persist for months, depending on the degree of blockage. Clinical and experimental data demonstrated that anti-Ro and anti-La autoantibodies functionally inhibit L-type calcium channels and induce abnormalities in electrical conduction of the cardiac myocytes. It has been 38 years since the first clinical description of CHB. Presently, the pathophysiology of CHB has been clarified through clinical and basic research studies.

 

Discovery of LE phenomenon

The first autoantibody described in lupus was ‘Lupus factor’ by Hargraves at the Mayo Clinic in 1948. He reported the ‘LE phenomenon’ in bone marrow aspirates of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This finding is considered as hallmark in the field of SLE research. In 1950, Haserik from Cleveland Clinic induced the LE phenomenon in normal bone marrow cells incubated with serum from lupus patients. The study also demonstrated that the LE phenomenon was induced by the ‘anti-deoxyribonucleoprotein antibody’ present in the serum of lupus patients. In 1957, Holman and Kunkel found anti-nucleoprotein antibodies, which preceded full descriptions of antinuclear antibodies. In 1961, Anderson and co-workers reported a precipitation reaction against salivary gland extracts, induced by antibodies named SjD and SjT. In 1966, Eng Tan described the serum reaction against tissues extracts that contained ribonucleoproteins, particularly against Sm (Smith protein). Clark and Reichlin in 1969 characterized the Ro antigen. Alspaugh and Tan reported the existence of the SSA antigen, and the research group later demonstrated that Ro is antigenically identical to SSA. The ribonucleoprotein La or SSB was also detected at the same time. Ro52 was characterized in 1988.These ribonucleoproteins serve as important biomarkers for autoimmune connective tissue diseases, especially for lupus and Sjögren’s syndrome. These autoantibodies are also of particular importance during pregnancy because they can induce neonatal pathologies.1

 

Physiological roles of Ro and La ribonucleoproteins

The Ro60 is a donut-shaped protein with binding sites for RNA. This ribonucleoprotein is localized in the nucleus and cytoplasm and its function depends on its location. Ro60 is associated with Y RNAs, and these small non-coding RNAs may form complexes with Ro60, thereby preventing Ro60 from binding to misfolded ncRNAs. Study using Deinococcus radiodurans model has shown that an exonuclease polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) is recruited to the Ro60-related Rsr/RNP complex. This recruitment induces conformational modification of the central cavity gateway of Ro60, which enables entry of a misfolded ncRNA for degradation.2, 3 In addition, Ro60 is likely involved in editing misfolded 5S rRNAs and in micro RNA (miRNA) regulation.4-6

 

Ro52, another member of the Ro family, is not related to Ro60 because it is encoded by a different gene. It has a molecular weight of 54 kDa and belongs to the tripartite motif protein (TRIM) family (TRIM21).This molecule has a RING finger domain located at the N-terminal. Since the Ro52 domain displays E3-ligase activity, Ro52 can ubiquitinate different interferon (IFN) regulatory factors. Thus Ro52 participates in the regulation of cytokine production and the innate immune response. Moreover, literature evidence substantiates the role of anti-Ro52 autoantibodies in inducing neonatal pathologies.7, 8

 

La or SSB autoantigen, a 48 kDa protein, functions as a transcription termination factor of RNA polymerase III. The ribonucleoprotein participates in the folding and maturation of RNA polymerase III transcripts and it also confers protection against exonuclease degradation. Additionally, the protein interacts with viral RNAs and plays a housekeeping role in the promotion of the global miRNA expression. Thus La binding to pre-miRNA is critical for stabilizing nascent pri-miRNA, and RNA binding occurs through the conserved La motif (LAM) and N-terminal RNA recognition motif (RRM1 and RRM2) domains.9 This ribonucleoprotein is important for cellular physiology and recent research has shown its relevance in human cancer transcriptomes and cancer prognosis.10

 

Anti-Ro and anti-La autoantibody pathological markers

Anti-Ro and anti-La autoantibodies are more prevalent in autoimmune connective tissue disease (CTD), and the range of associated diseases varies depending on the serotype ethnic group and/or the technology used for autoantibody detection.11 For example, anti-Ro is detected in 70-100% of patients with Sjögren’s syndrome, whereas La/SSB is detected in 40-90% of Sjögren’s patients.12 In SLE patients, the prevalence of anti-Ro is approximately 68%,whereas anti-La prevalence is 23%. Notably, these autoantibodies are frequently detected as ‘antibody clusters’ in SLE and both anti-Ro/La autoantibodies are often associated with anti-DNA antibodies. Therefore, SLE patients displaying this autoantibody cluster, exhibit a clinical phenotype associated with increased kidney involvement, which is manifested by proteinuria and nephrotic syndrome. These patients may also have secondary Sjögren’s syndrome.13 In scleroderma and inflammatory myositis, anti-Ro prevalence is lower and ranges from 3-15%.12

 

Autoimmune diseases have been associated with detailed serotypes. For example, subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) has been historically associated with anti-Ro60 or anti-La antibodies. The use of recombinant proteins, such as anti-Ro60 and anti-Ro52 autoantibodies, has expanded the antigenic specificity of SCLE. Anti-Ro52 is an additional component of the SCLE autoantibody cluster.14-16 Therefore, the most objective methods for assessing certain autoantibodies as markers of disease should consider these autoantibody groups.

 

Apart from anti-Ro60, anti-Ro52, and anti-La antibodies, there is a wide range of other autoantibodies associated with systemic lupus erythematosus and Sjögren’s syndrome. The association of this autoantibody cluster with neonatal pathologies, induced by maternal autoantibodies, is discussed in the following sections.

 

Neonatal pathologies induced by anti-Ro and anti-La antibodies

Neonatal lupus (NL), with or without congenital heart block (CHB), is induced by maternal antinuclear antibodies (ANAs). Skin manifestations of neonatal lupus appear at birth or a few weeks later, and cutaneous lesions may persist for 16 weeks. CHB, another neonatal pathology associated with maternal ANAs, is characterized by intrauterine bradycardia or low heart rates at birth. It may persist for months, depending on the degree of the blockage. Both of these neonatal pathologies are associated with anti-Ro and/or anti-La antibodies.17-24

                                

Molecular determinants of neonatal pathologies

The descriptions of neonatal clinical syndromes, induced by maternal antibodies, raise several questions: Why do anti-Ro and anti-La antibodies induce skin lesions in neonatal lupus? What determines the characteristic atrioventricular (AV) block in CHB? Which factors influence fibrosis of the AV node and determine permanent AV blocks?

 

Lee and co-workers have concluded that anti-Ro (SS-A) antibodies may be directly involved in cutaneous disease. The study was conducted by transplanting the foreskin of newborn babies into nude mice and subsequently injecting with human anti-Ro antibodies. The mice developed erythematous lesions similar to those observed in neonatal lupus, and immune deposits of anti-Ro antibodies occurred at dermoepidermal junctions and other skin structures. Additionally, the mice demonstrated that these antibodies produced antibody-dependent cytotoxicity.25 Subsequent studies have shown that the autoantibodies were found to produce apoptosis of basal keratinocytes, creating a major source of intracellular antigens, which induces the formation of local immune complexes, cytotoxicity, and production of inflammatory cytokines. These mechanisms appear to cause the skin lesions in neonatal lupus, but they generally disappear after the elimination of maternal antibodies.26

 

An autopsy study of infants, died due to congenital heart block (CHB), born to mothers with SLE, has shown fibrotic changes in the atrioventricular node. The study also reported that these changes affected early atrioventricular node development. Thus, nodal fibrosis presumably contributed to CHB.17 Buyon and co-workers have established the association of the CHB with maternal autoantibodies. They have also defined the autoimmune association of this neonatal pathology.

 

The research by Buyon and team has reported several clinical and experimental factors associated with the pathophysiology of congenital heart block.27-32 The current review highlights some of the important factors. Clinical observations have shown that the fetus may develop CHB between 22 and 26 weeks of pregnancy in mothers with anti-Ro and anti-La antibodies. This risk has been confirmed in several clinical studies and in experimental mouse models in which pregnant females are injected with anti-Ro60, anti-Ro52, and anti-La antibodies. The degree of AV block varies in 2-7% of animals and it is comparable to the incidence in humans.33-37

 

Chronic effects of maternal antibodies on fetal hearts have been observed during the prenatal care of women with lupus or Sjögren’s syndrome. Experimental studies conducted in animal models have demonstrated that induction of acute effects in animal models via anti-Ro/La perfusion on denervated hearts (Langendorff-perfused hearts) caused bradycardia.35, 38-41 However, none of the clinical and experimental findings clarifies the underlying cause of bradycardia. The AV node is crucial for the genesis and propagation of the electric impulse into ventricles. Therefore, electropropagation is dependent on L-type calcium channels, and experimental evidence indicates that the CHB-IgG functionally inhibits L-type calcium channels and induces abnormalities in electrical conduction of the cardiac myocytes. These abnormalities include sinus bradycardia, prolonged PR, and complete AV block.42-46

 

L-type calcium channels and congenital heart block

The calcium influx through calcium channels (CaV) in cardiac muscles generates multifunctional signals in excitable cells that trigger cardiac contraction. CaV also controls the duration of action potential and regulates gene expression. These voltage-gated calcium channels consist of at least four subunits; the α1 subunit forms the pore structure and contains four homologous domains, and each domain encompasses six membrane spanning segments that are connected by several intracellular loops. Each domain has a voltage sensor. Additionally, accessory subunits such as α2δ and β and γ are implicated in anchorage, trafficking, and regulatory functions.

 

Different CACNA1 genes encode ten α subunits of the CaV1 channel. The CaV1.2 α1 gene contains 50 exons that display at least 13 alternative splicing loci, resulting in protein diversity. Therefore, during development, CaV1.2 α1 expression changes due to splice variants. These variants are associated with a depolarizing shift activation, suggesting a possible maturation role in fetal and mature isoforms of juvenile cardiomyocytes.47, 48 Adult ventricular myocytes only express the CaV1.2 α1C subunit.49

 

CHB-IgG selectively inhibits the currents generated by L-type and T-type calcium channels in freshly isolated myocytes from the AV node. However, because α1C in the L-channel plays a minimal role in diastolic depolarization, the α1D isoform has emerged as an important component of the pacemaker node. This isoform is also expressed in neuroendocrine tissue. In contrast, the expression of α1D is distinct in the sinoatrial node. Therefore, these channels play an important role in inducing AV block and causing sinusal bradycardia in CHB. Brucato et al. have reported a few cases of infants with sinus bradycardia associated with anti-Ro maternal antibodies.50 The in vitro studies conducted using the sera from babies with CHB had demonstrated that anti-Ro inhibited α1D and α1C channel activity, suggesting that the effect of anti-Ro may functionally affect the AV node and/or sinoatrial node (Fig. 1).41, 51

 

Fig.1: Pathogenic effects of maternal anti-Ro and anti-La autoantibodies that cross-react with fetal heart antigens from the pore-forming subunit of α1C and α1D, and produce CHB

×

 

Although clinical and experimental evidence suggests that anti-Ro and anti-La antibodies induce congenital heart block, it is unclear how these maternal antibodies interact with their intracellular molecular targets in the fetal heart. Miranda-Carus and colleagues demonstrated that Ro and La ribonucleoproteins translocate to the cell membrane of apoptotic cardiomyocytes.52 Further, exposure to these proteins on the cell surface, in the presence of maternal antibodies, induces the formation of immune complexes, which are subsequently cleared by scavengers. The immune complexes stimulate signaling pathways in infiltrating macrophages, causing excess cytokine production including TGFβ. This in turn induces the transdifferentiation of cardiomyocytes into fibroblasts, ultimately producing fibrosis in the AV node.53

 

The α1D and α1C channels are functionally inhibited by maternal autoantibodies in CHB. However, the underlying mechanism remains unknown. The experiments conducted by Boutjdir et. al and other researchers have demonstrated that anti-Ro and anti-La autoantibodies cross-react with antigens from the pore-forming subunit of α1C and α1D channels. Additionally, a fraction of these maternal antibodies recognizes GST fusion proteins that express the extracellular S5-S6 loop of the first domain of the α1D subunit of L-type calcium and the α1G subunit of T-type calcium channels.54, 55

 

Conclusion

It has been 38 years and 25 years respectively, after reporting the first clinical description of CHB and its association with maternal anti-Ro and anti-La antibodies. The pathophysiology of CHB has been clarified by a large group of clinical and basic scientists at the cellular and molecular levels. Further research elucidating the role of autoantigen-autoantibody system may assist in developing newer strategies for treating autoimmune diseases.

 

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

 

Declaration of Interest

None

 

References

1.     Wolin S. RNPs and autoimmunity: 20 years later. RNA. 2015; 21(4):248-49.

2.     Chen X, Taylor DW, Galan JE, Wang HW, Wolin SL. An RNA degradation machine sculpted by Ro autoantigen and noncoding RNA. Cell. 2013; 153(1):166-77.

3.     Wolin SL, Belair C, Bocciotto M, Chen X, Taylor DW, Wang HW. Non-coding Y RNAs as tethers and gates. Insights from bacteria. RNA Biology. 2013; 10(10):1602-1608.

4.     O´Brien CA, Wolin SL. A possible role for the 60-kD Ro autoantigen in a discard pathway for defective 5S rRNA precursors. Genes Dev. 1994; 8(23):2891-903.

5.     Campos-Almaraz ML, Fraire-Velázquez S, Moreno J, Herrera-Esparza R. The 5S rRNA is associated with Ro60 ribonucleoprotein and is co-precipitated with hYRNAs by anti-Ro antibodies. Autoimmunity. 1999; 31(2):95-101.

6.     Köhn M, Pazaitis N, Hüttelmaier S. Why Y RNAs? About versatile RNAs and their functions. Biomolecules. 2013; 3(1):143-56.

7.     Espinosa A, Zhou W, Ek M, Hedlund M, Brauner S, Popovic K, et al. The Sjögren syndrome associated autoantigen Ro52 is an E3 ligase that regulate proliferation and cell death. J Immunol. 2006; 176(10):6277-85.

8.     Kong HJ, Anderson DE, Lee CH, Jand MK, Tamura T, Tailor P, et al. Cutting edge: Autoantigen Ro52 is an interferon inducible E3 ligase that ubiquitinates IRF-8 and enhances cytokine expression in macrophages. J Immunol. 2007; 179(1):26-30.

9.     Chasapis C, Argyriou AI, Apositolidi M, Konstantinidou P, Bentrop D, Stathopoulos C, et al. 1H,13C and 15N backbone and side chain ressonance assignment of the LAM-RRM1 N-terminal module of La protein from Dictyostelium discoideum. Biomol NMR assign, 2015; DOI 10.1007/s12104-015-9597-z

10.   Liang C, Xiong K, Szulwach KE, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Peng J, et al. Sjögren syndrome antigen B (SSB)/La promotes global microRNA expression by binding microRNA precursors through stem-loop recognition. J Biol Chem. 2013; 288(1);723-36.

11.   Peene I, Meheus L, Veys EM, De Keyser F. Diagnostic associations in a large and consecutively identified population positive for anti-SSA and/or anti-SSB: the range of associated diseases differs according to the detailed serotype. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002; 61(12):1090-4.

12.   Yoshimi R, Ueda A, Ozato K, Ishigatsubo Y. Clinical and pathological roles of Ro/SSA autoantibody system. Clin Develop Immunol. 2012; 2012:606195.

13.   To CH, Petri M. Is antibody clustering predictive of clinical subsets and damage in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 52(12);4003-10.

14.   Provost TT, Herrera-Esparza R, Diaz LA. Nucleoprotein autoantibodies in lupus erythematosus, J Invest Dermatol 1985; 85(1 Suppl):133s-9s.

15.   Biazar C, Sigges J, Patsinakidis N, Ruland V, Amler S, Bonsmann G, et al. Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: first multicenter database analysis of 1002 patients from the European Society of Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus (EUSCLE). Autoimmune rev 2013; 12(3):444-54.

16.   Popovic K, Brauner S, Ek M, Wahren-Herlenius M, Nyberg F. Fine specificity of the Ro/SSA autoantibody response in relation to serological and clinical findings in 96 patients with self-reported cutaneous symptoms induced by the sun. Lupus 2007; 16(1):10-7.

17.   Chameides L, Truex RC, Vetter V, Rashkind WJ, Galioto FM Jr, Noonan JA. Association of maternal systemic lupus erythematosus with congenital complete heart block. N Engl J Med 1977; 297(22):1204-7.

18.   Schmidt KG, Ulmer HE, Silverman NH, Kleinman CS, Copel JA. Perinatal outcome of fetal complete atrioventricular block: a multicenter experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991; 17(6):1360-6.

19.   Julkunen H, Kurki P, Kaaja R, Heikkila R, Immonen I, Chan EK, et al. Isolated congenital heart block. Long-term outcome of mothers and characterization of the immune response to SS-A/Ro and to SS-B/La. Arthritis Rheum. 1993; 36(11):1588-98.

20.   Waltuck J, Buyon JP. Autoantibody-associated congenital heart block: outcome in mothers and children. Ann Intern Med. 1994; 120(7):544-551.

21.   Silverman ED. Congenital heart block and neonatal lupus erythematosus: prevention is the goal. J Rheumatol. 1993; 20(7):1101-4.

22.   Buyon JP, Hiebert R, Copel J, Craft J, Friedman D, Katholi M, et al. Autoimmune-associated congenital heart block: demographics, mortality, morbidity and recurrence rates obtained from a national neonatal lupus registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 31(7):1658-66.

23.   Brucato A, Cimaz R, Stramba-Badiale M. Neonatal lupus. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2002; 23(3):279-99

24.   Capone C, Buyon JP, Friedman DM, Frishman WH. Cardiac manifestations of neonatal lupus: A review of autoantibody associated congenital heart block and its impact in an adult population. Cardiol Rev. 2012; 20(2):72-6.

25.   Lee LA, Weston WL, Krueger GG, et al. An animal model of antibody binding in cutaneous lupus. Arthritis Rheum. 1986; 29(6):782-8.

26.   Herrera-Esparza R, Villalobos R, Bollain-Y-Goytia JJ, Ramírez-Sandoval R, Sánchez-Rodriguez SH, Pacheco-Tovar G, et al. Apoptosis and redistribution of the Ro autoantigen in Balb/c mouse like in sub-acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Clin Dev Immunol. 2006; 13(2-4):163-6.

27.   Buyon JP, Waltuck J, Caldwell K, Crawford B, Slade SG, Copel J, et al. Relationship between maternal and neonatal levels of antibodies to 48 kDa SSB(La), 52 kDa SSA(Ro), and 60 kDa SSA(Ro) in pregnancies complicated by congenital heart block. J Rheumatol. 1994; 21(10):1943-50.

28.   Buyon JP, Waltuck J, Kleinman C, Copel J. In utero identification and therapy of congenital heart block. Lupus. 1995; 4(2):116-21.

29.   Tseng CE, Caldwell K, Feit S, Chan EK, Buyon JP. Subclass distribution of maternal and neonatal anti-Ro(SSA) and La(SSB) antibodies in congenital heart block. J Rheumatol. 1996; 23(5):925-32.

30.   Boutjdir M, Chen L, Zhang ZH, Tseng CE, DiDonato F, Rashbaum W, et al. Arrhythmogenicity of IgG and anti-52-kD SSA/Ro affinity-purified antibodies from mothers of children with congenital heart block. Circ Res. 1997; 80(3):354-62.

31.   Friedman DM, Rupel A, Glickstein J, Buyon JP. Congenital heart block in neonatal lupus: the pediatric cardiologist’s perspective. Indian J Pediatr. 2002; 69(6):517-22.

32.   Buyon JP, Tseng CE, Di Donato F, Rashbaum W, Morris A, Chan EK. Cardiac expression of 52beta, an alternative transcript of the congenital heart block-associated 52-kd SS-A/Ro autoantigen, is maximal during fetal development. Arthritis Rheum. 1997; 40(4):655-60.

33.   Boutjdir M, Chen L, Zhang ZH, Tseng CE, El-Sherif N, Buyon JP. Serum and immunoglobulin G from the mother of a child with congenital heart block induce conduction abnormalities and inhibit L-type calcium channels in a rat heart model. Pediatr Res. 1998; 44(1):11-9.

34.   Mazel JA, El-Sherif N, Buyon J, Boutjdir M. Electrocardiographic abnormalities in a murine model injected with IgG from mothers of children with congenital heart block. Circulation. 1999; 99 (14):1914-8.

35.   Restivo M, Kozhevnikov DO, Boutjdir M. Optical mapping of activation patterns in an animal model of congenital heart block. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001; 280(4):H1889-95.

36.   Garcia S, Nascimento JH, Bonfa E, Levy R, Oliveira SF, Tavares AV, de Carvalho AC. Cellular mechanism of the conduction abnormalities induced by serum from anti-Ro/SSA-positive patients in rabbit hearts. J Clin Invest. 1994; 93(2):718-24.

37.   Miranda-Carús ME, Boutjdir M, Tseng CE, Di-Donato F, Chan EK, Buyon JP. Induction of antibodies reactive with SSA/Ro-SSB/La and development of congenital heart block in a murine model. J Immunol 1998; 161(11):5886-92.

38.   Hamilton RM, Lee-Poy M, Kruger K, Silverman ED. Investigative methods of congenital heart block. J Electrocardiol. 1998; 30 Suppl:69-74.

39.   Viana VS, Garcia S, Nascimento JH, Elkon KB, Brot N, Campos de Carvalho AC, et al. Induction of in vitro heart block is not restricted to affinity purified anti-52 kDa Ro/SSA antibody from mothers of children with neonatal lupus. Lupus. 1998; 7(3):141-7.

40.   Boutjdir M. Molecular and ionic basis of congenital complete heart block. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2000; 10(3):114-22.

41.   Qu Y, Boutjdir M. Pathophysiology of autoimmune-associated congenital heart block. Applied Cardiopulmonary Pathophysiology. 2012; 16:96-112.

42.   Salomonsson S, Sonesson SE, Ottosson L, Muhallab S, Olsson T, Sunnerhagen M, et al. Ro/SSA autoantibodies directly bind cardiomyocytes, disturb calcium homeostasis, and mediate congenital heart block. J Exp Med. 2005; 201(1):11-7.

43.   Qu Y, Baroudi G, Yue Y, Boutjdir M. Novel molecular mechanism involving alpha1D (Cav1.3) L-type calcium channel in autoimmune-associated sinus bradycardia. Circulation. 2005; 111(23):3034-41.

44.   Gardiner HM, Belmar C, Pasquini L, Seale A, Thomas M, Dennes W, et al. Fetal ECG: a novel predictor of atrioventricular block in anti-Ro positive pregnancies. Heart. 2007; 93(11):1454-60.

45.   Buyon JP, Clancy RM, Friedman DM. Autoimmune associated congenital heart block: integration of clinical and research clues in the management of the maternal / foetal dyad at risk. J Intern Med. 2009; 265(6):653-62.

46.   Ambrosi A, Dzikaite V, Park J, Strandberg L, Kuchroo VK, Herlenius E, et al. Anti-Ro52 monoclonal antibodies specific for amino acid 200-239, but not other Ro52 epitopes, induce congenital heart block in a rat model. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012; 71(3):448-54.

47.   Shaw RM, Colecraft HM. L-type calcium channel targeting and local signaling in cardiac myocytes. Cardiovasc Res. 2013; 98(2):177-86.

48.   Tang ZZ, Liang MC, Lu S, Yu D, Yu CY, Yue DT, et al. Transcript scanning reveals novel and extensive splice variations in human l-type voltage-gated calcium channel, Cav1.2 alpha1 subunit. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279(43):44 335-43.

49.   Hofmann F, Flockerzi V, Kahl S, Wegener JW. L-type CaV1.2 calcium channels: from in vitro findings to in vivo function. Physiol Rev. 2014; 94(1):303-26.

50.   Brucato A, Cimaz R, Catelli L, Meroni P. Anti-Ro-associated sinus bradycardia in newborns. Circulation. 2000; 102 (11): E88-9.

51.   Hu K, Qu Y, Yue Y, Boutjdir M. Functional basis of sinus bradycardia in congenital heart block. Circ Res. 2004; 94(4):e32-8.

52.   Miranda-Carús ME, Askanase AD, Clancy RM, Di Donato F, Chou TM, Libera MR, et al. Anti-SSA/Ro and anti-SSB/La autoantibodies bind the surface of apoptotic fetal cardiocytes and promote secretion of TNF-alpha by macrophages. J Immunol. 2000; 165(9):5345-51.

53.   Clancy RM, Askanase AD, Kapur RP, Chiopelas E, Azar N, Miranda-Carus ME, et al. Trans differentiation of cardiac fibroblasts, a fetal factor in anti-SSA/Ro-SSB/La antibody-mediated congenital heart block. J Immunol. 2002; 169(4):2156-63.

54.   Karnabi E, Qu Y, Wadgaonkar R, Mancarella S, Yue Y, Chahine M, et al. Congenital heart block: identification of autoantibody binding site on the extracellular loop (domain I, S5-S6) of alpha(1D) L-type Ca channel. J Autoimmun. 2010; 34(2):80-86.

55.   Strandberg LS, Cui X, Rath A, Liu J, Silverman ED, Liu X, et al. Congenital heart block maternal sera autoantibodies target an extracellular epitope on the α1G T-type calcium channel in human fetal hearts. PLoS One. 2013; 8(9):e72668.